Contextualizing DepEd AI guidelines in early childhood education practice: Understanding the distinctive context of kindergarten
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Foundational Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence in Basic Education of the Philippine Department of Education (DepEd Order No. 003, s. 2026) is a comprehensive policy framework for the K-12 program. However, the policy recognizes that this policy is “more of a framework and that specific operational and technical guidelines shall be issued separately” (Sections II and V of the policy document). Hence, this study seeks to present some relevant considerations and contextualization that may help in the development of operational guidelines within the realm of early education. It is the contention of the researchers that early childhood education has a unique place in the context of basic education. Using a qualitative descriptive method, which integrates document analysis with a synthesis of previous research studies on the application of AI in early childhood education, the researchers found the following key characteristics of early education that should be noted in the direction of AI policies and trainings: (1) AI use in kindergarten is teacher-mediated rather than learner-driven; (2) developmental appropriateness requires specialized teacher literacy; (3) teacher AI literacy serves as the critical infrastructure for ethical AI integration; (4) cultural and linguistic relevance demands culturally responsive AI competencies; and (5) child data privacy necessitates heightened, practical safeguards. The study concludes with six practical considerations for developing complementary AI guidance tailored to early childhood education, emphasizing teacher capacity, specialized literacy training, culturally relevant resources, simplified data privacy protocols, communities of practice, and accountability aligned with professional growth.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
Department of Education, “DO 003, s. 2026 – Foundational guidelines on artificial intelligence (AI) in basic education.” [Online]. Available: https://www.deped.gov.ph
OECD, Results from TALIS 2024. in TALIS. OECD Publishing, 2025. doi: 10.1787/90df6235-en.
Department of Education, MATATAG curriculum guide: Kindergarten. Republic of the Philippines, 2024.
National Association for the Education of Young Children & Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media, Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (Position statement). National Association for the Education of Young Children. [Online]. Available: https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/globally-shared/downloads/PDFs/resources/position-statements/ps_technology.pdf
S. Hall and L. Liebenberg, “Qualitative Description as an Introductory Method to Qualitative Research for Master’s-Level Students and Research Trainees,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 23, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1177/16094069241242264.
M. Villanueva, “Comparative analysis of AI governance models,” Ignatian Int. J., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 543–565, 2025.
A. Florendo, Jr., “The Mediating Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy in Graduate Seminar Coursework and Ethical Preparedness: Insights from the Graduate Students,” J. Interdiscip. Perspect., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 302–312, 2026, doi: 10.69569/jip.2025.698.
A. Saxena and Y. Wei, “Pre‑Service Teachers’ Engagement with Generative AI in Early Years Education: A Multiple-Case Study from Hong Kong,” Iris J. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 5, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.33552/IJER.2025.05.000625.
A. Liu et al., “How K-12 Educators Use AI: LLM-Assisted Qualitative Analysis at Scale,” in American Educational Research Association (AERA) 2026 Annual Meeting, Dec. 2025, pp. 1–33. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17985
M. Deshen, R. Harari, and N. Aharony, “Teachers’ artificial intelligence (AI) literacy: an exploratory study,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 7, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1186/s40561-026-00433-5.
L. Li, “Early Childhood Teachers’ Professional Development: The Hybrid Educational Experiment,” in Cultural-historical digital methodology in early childhood settings, M. Fleer, G. Fragkiadaki, E. E. Ødegaard, P. Rai, and A. R. Sadownik, Eds., Springer, Cham, 2024, pp. 67–78. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-59785-5_6.
T. Bertram et al., “EECERA ethical code for early childhood researchers,” Eur. Early Child. Educ. Res. J., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 4–18, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2024.2445361.
J. V. Cubio, “The Influence of Privacy, Bias, and Surveillance Concerns on Teachers’ Willingness to Use Artificial Intelligence in Education,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3S, pp. 3192–3208, May 2025, doi: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0240.
S. Yu, Y. Hou, and H. Li, “Suitability of Chinese GenAI platforms for early childhood education: A multifaceted evaluation,” AI, Brain Child, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 7, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44436-025-00008-0.
J. M. S. Wong, “Designing Trustworthy AI for the Youngest Learners: An Integrated Ethical Framework and Implementation Roadmap,” Early Child. Educ. J., pp. 1–11, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1007/s10643-026-02138-3.
T. Hoel and M. Jernes, “Quality in children’s digital picture books: seven key strands for educational reflections for shared dialogue-based reading in early childhood settings,” Early Years, vol. 44, no. 3–4, pp. 480–494, May 2024, doi: 10.1080/09575146.2023.2172552.
V. Craker, “University of Puget Sound professor uncovers AI’s Western bias,” University of Puget Sound. [Online]. Available: https://www.pugetsound.edu/stories/university-puget-sound-professor-uncovers-ais-western-bias
M. Nyaaba et al., “Human Experts’ Evaluation of Generative AI for Contextualizing STEAM Education in the Global South,” arXiv, Nov. 2025, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19482
I. R. Berson, M. J. Berson, and W. Luo, “Innovating responsibly: Ethical considerations for AI,” AI Brain Child, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 2, 2025.
X. Su, X. Xu, and T. Wang, “Innovation of Teaching and Learning Scenes and Models Empowered by Artificial Intelligence: Practice and Experience of AI-Powered Programming Courses,” Front. Digit. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 4, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1007/s44366-026-0078-y.
R. Gahrn-Andersen, “From explicit prompts to tacit engagements: understanding in practice with LLMs,” AI Soc., Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1007/s00146-026-02904-2.
V. Alexandrowicz, “Artificial Intelligence Integration in Teacher Education: Navigating Benefits, Challenges, and Transformative Pedagogy,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 13, no. 6, p. 346, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.5539/jel.v13n6p346.
P. E. Mariñoso, P. Á. C. García, I. M. Jareño, and E. C. Rodriguez, “Evaluating the use of AI in the design of learning situations by university students of early childhood education,” Front. Psychol., vol. 16, pp. 148–161, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1604414.
A. Fernández‐Sánchez, J. J. Lorenzo‐Castiñeiras, and A. Sánchez‐Bello, “Navigating the Future of Pedagogy: The Integration of AI Tools in Developing Educational Assessment Rubrics,” Eur. J. Educ., vol. 60, no. 1, p. e12826, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1111/ejed.12826.
A. Rademacher, N. Bäker, U. von Düring, V. Hiltunen, and N. Goagoses, “The effects of early childhood education and care quality on academic competences in early primary school: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Eur. J. Psychol. Educ., vol. 40, no. 4, p. 110, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10212-025-01005-w.
K. Naithani, S. Tiwari, and S. Kumari, AI for Product Development. Taylor & Francis Group, 2025. doi: 10.1201_9781003536901.
M. Grimus, “Emerging Technologies: Impacting Learning, Pedagogy and Curriculum Development,” in Emerging Technologies and Pedagogies in the Curriculum, S. Yu, M. Ally, and A. Tsinakos, Eds., Springer, 2020, pp. 127–151. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-0618-5_8.
N. Alcober, “DepEd rolls out Project AGAP.AI,” Daily Tribune, Jan. 09, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://tribune.net.ph/2026/01/09/deped-rolls-out-project-agapai
T. Lantos, “The impact of sudden changes on the professional development and learning of kindergarten teachers,” Képzés és Gyak. Nevel. folyóirat, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 17–29, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.17165/tp.2025.2.17-29.
A. A. Gunn et al., “Revisiting culturally responsive teaching practices for early childhood preservice teachers,” J. Early Child. Teach. Educ., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 265–280, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1080/10901027.2020.1735586.
G. Kirk and J. Jay, “Supporting Kindergarten Children’s Social and Emotional Development: Examining the Synergetic Role of Environments, Play, and Relationships,” J. Res. Child. Educ., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 472–485, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1080/02568543.2018.1495671.
J. Pearson, “London nurseries hit by hackers, data on 8,000 children stolen,” The Star, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2025/09/26/london-nurseries-hit-by-hackers-data-on-8000-children-stolen#goog_rewarded
A. Atabey, K. R. Sylwander, and S. Livingstone, “A child rights audit of GenAI in EdTech: Learning from five UK case studies.” [Online]. Available: https://ecrea.wildapricot.org/page-18206/13543332
UNICEF, “Data governance for EdTech.” [Online]. Available: https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/reports/data-governance-edtech