AI as learning scaffold or crutch? Secondary students’ experiences in English language learning through Vygotsky’s ZPD lens
Main Article Content
Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into English language learning marks a significant pedagogical shift, yet its implications for secondary-level learners in resource-constrained contexts remain underexplored. This study examines how secondary students in semi-urban Nepal perceive AI tools—ChatGPT, Google Translate, Deep Seek, and Gemini—through the lens of Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), asking whether AI functions as a scaffold that enhances linguistic competence or a crutch that erodes autonomy. Using a phenomenological design, data were collected from twenty-three purposively selected students through semi-structured interviews, analyzed via Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Findings reveal a dual role: AI extended students' capacities within the ZPD through instant feedback, corrective support, and confidence-building, yet simultaneously fostered dependency, superficial engagement, and academic dishonesty when used without guidance. Students navigated this tension by critically evaluating AI outputs, adapting them to local context, and relying on teacher mediation to ensure ethical use. Persistent infrastructural inequality further constrained equitable engagement across participants. The study underscores teachers' indispensable mediating role in transforming AI from a shortcut into a genuine scaffold, and calls for structured AI literacy, teacher training, and equity-oriented policy to support responsible integration in under-resourced English language classrooms.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
P. R. Ghimire and B. P. Neupane, “Teachers’ Perception and Experiences on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Integration in English Language Teaching and Learning,” Lumbini J. Lang. Lit., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 104–116, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3126/ljll.v4i1.73918.
D. R. C. Javier and B. L. Moorhouse, “Developing secondary school English language learners’ productive and critical use of ChatGPT,” TESOL J., vol. 15, no. 2, p. e755, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1002/tesj.755.
B. K. Khadka, D. K. Shahi, D. K. Khatri, and Y. Poudel, “Use of artificial intelligence for pedagogical purposes in EFL classroom in Nepal,” J. Xi’an Shiyou Univ. (Natural Sci. Ed., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 75–92, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14857299.
L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
L. Lim et al., “Effects of real-time analytics-based personalized scaffolds on students’ self-regulated learning,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 139, p. 107547, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107547.
M. Isaac, M. Ateeq, H. Hafizh, B. Hu, and D. Shodipo, “Leveraging Artificial Intelligence with Zone of Proximal Development: An ARCS Motivational E-Learning Model,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), R. Sinha, Ed., IEEE, Nov. 2023, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/TALE56641.2023.10398344.
L. Kohnke, B. L. Moorhouse, and D. Zou, “ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning,” RELC J., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 537–550, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1177/00336882231162868.
J. Grose, “What teachers told me about A.I. in school,” The New York Times, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/14/opinion/ai-schools-teachers-students.html
M. Devkota and N. Neupane, “Influence of English on local languages: Perspectives from key stakeholders,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Educ. Res. Innov., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 145–157, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.17613/mwqdk-z4n43.
X. Wang, H. Pang, M. P. Wallace, Q. Wang, and W. Chen, “Learners’ perceived AI presences in AI-supported language learning: a study of AI as a humanized agent from community of inquiry,” Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 814–840, May 2024, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2022.2056203.
C. Zhai, S. Wibowo, and L. D. Li, “The effects of over ‑ reliance on AI dialogue systems on students ’ cognitive abilities : a systematic review,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 11, no. 28, pp. 1–37, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7.
P. Lawaju, S. U. Adhikari, and J. Devkota, “Impact of AI in Education: An Evidence from Use of ChatGPT in Management Education in Nepal,” Quest J. Manag. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 621–642, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3126/qjmss.v6i3.72875.
S. S. Erfani and S. Ebadi, “Digital divide and AI in ELT,” J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 87–103, 2021.
K. Bhattarai and M. Yousef, “Education Challenges and Opportunities,” in The Middle East: Past, Present, and Future, Springer, 2025, pp. 255–266. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-83967-2_9.
M. B. Chand, S. K.C., and M. Maharjan, “Unveiling Disparities: A Case of Digital Divide in Nepal,” J. Econ. Concerns, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 130–142, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3126/tjec.v15i1.70246.
D. B. Alsaedi, “AI in learning English: Enhancing English skills through the use of AI-powered language learning tools,” Int. J. Educ. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 07, no. 05, pp. 82–94, 2024, doi: 10.37500/IJESSR.2024.7508.
H. Crompton, A. Edmett, N. Ichaporia, and D. Burke, “AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2503–2529, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13460.
Z. Sun, M. Anbarasan, and D. Praveen Kumar, “Design of online intelligent English teaching platform based on artificial intelligence techniques,” Comput. Intell., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1166–1180, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1111/coin.12351.
D. Mahat, “Readiness for Artificial Intelligence Integration in Government Services: Perspectives from Ramechhap District Employees,” J. Multidisiplin Madani, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 486–495, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.55927/mudima.v4i4.8435.
H. Fakhar, M. Lamrabet, N. Echantoufi, K. El Khattabi, and L. Ajana, “Towards a New Artificial Intelligence-based Framework for Teachers’ Online Continuous Professional Development Programs: Systematic Review,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 15, no. 4, p. 480, 2024, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150450.
P. Mei, D. N. Brewis, F. Nwaiwu, D. Sumanathilaka, F. Alva-Manchego, and J. Demaree-Cotton, “If ChatGPT can do it, where is my creativity? generative AI boosts performance but diminishes experience in creative writing,” Comput. Hum. Behav. Artif. Humans, vol. 4, p. 100140, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100140.
W. Cong, L. S. Pek, Z. Yuchen, I. N. A. Latif, Z. Bo, and L. Ming, “Integrating Generative AI in Language Education: A Systematic Review of Pedagogical, Ethical, and Technological Themes,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 577–595, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.25.2.26.
A. O. Ifelebuegu, P. Kulume, and P. Cherukut, “Chatbots and AI in Education (AIEd) tools: The good, the bad, and the ugly,” J. Appl. Learn. Teach., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 332–345, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.29.
M. Asadi, S. Ebadi, and L. Mohammadi, “The impact of integrating ChatGPT with teachers’ feedback on EFL writing skills,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 56, p. 101766, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101766.
J. M. Fernández-Cárdenas, R. Wegerif, N. Mercer, and S. Rojas-Drummond, “Re-conceptualising ‘scaffolding’ and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning,” J. Classr. Interact., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 40–54, 2001.
H. Kwon and K. Shim, “The study on categorizing scaffolding types of AI chatbots for primary English learning-oriented assessment.,” Korea Assoc. Prim. English Educ., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 33–51, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.25231/pee.2023.29.3.33.
I. Ahmed, A. Ghafoor, D. Liliuara, and V. Q. Akyuningrum, “The impact of ai learning tools on ESL learners’ motivation and success: A systematic literature review,” English Learn. Innov., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 134–142, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.22219/englie.v6i1.38961.
M. Devkota, “Unveiling Nepali Students’ Lived Experiences of ChatGPT in Secondary School Education: Opportunities and Challenges,” Madhyabindu J., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 110–127, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.3126/madhyabindu.v10i1.75619.
A.-Z. Abdulrahman M, “Balancing Act: Exploring the Interplay Between Human Judgment and Artificial Intelligence in Problem-solving, Creativity, and Decision-making,” IgMin Res., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 145–158, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.61927/igmin158.
J. Rudolph, F. Ismail, S. Tan, and P. Seah, “Don’t believe the hype. AI myths and the need for a critical approach in higher education,” J. Appl. Learn. Teach., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 06–27, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2025.8.1.1.
D. Baidoo-Anu and L. Owusu Ansah, “Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning,” J. AI, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 52–62, 2023, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4337484.
M. U. Haque, I. Dharmadasa, Z. T. Sworna, R. N. Rajapakse, and H. Ahmad, “"I think this is the most disruptive technology”: Exploring sentiments of ChatGPT early adopters using Twitter data [Preprint],” 2022.
M. Sallam, “ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns,” Healthcare, vol. 11, no. 6, p. 887, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060887.
B. P. Neupane et al., “English Language Teaching in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Tools, Techniques, and Methodologies,” Adv. Mob. Learn. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1356–1369, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.25082/AMLER.2025.01.011.
M. Acharya and S. Bansyat, “Teachers’ Perceptions of Integrating ChatGPT in Nepalese Classrooms,” Interdiscip. Res. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 140–150, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.3126/ire.v9i1.69753.
T. Chanpradit, “Generative artificial intelligence in academic writing in higher education: A systematic review,” Edelweiss Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 889–906, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6128.
K. Kuddus, “Artificial Intelligence in Language Learning: Practices and Prospects,” in Advanced Analytics and Deep Learning Models, S. C. Satapathy, V. Bhateja, and S. C. Patel, Eds., Wiley, 2022, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.1002/9781119792437.ch1.
W. Wei and D. Chao, The Routledge Handbook of the Sociopolitical Context of Language Learning. London: Routledge, 2025. doi: 10.4324/9781003398172.
M. R. Ahmadi, “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review,” Int. J. Res. English Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 115–125, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.29252/ijree.3.2.115.
A. P. Gilakjani and N. B. Sabouri, “Teachers’ beliefs in English language teaching and learning: A review of the literature,” English Lang. Teach., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 78–86, 2017, doi: 10.5539/elt.
D. Larsen-Freeman, Teaching grammar, 3rd ed. Heinle & Heinle Publishers, 2001.
A. Wiriyachitra, “English language teaching and learning in Thailand in this decade,” Thai TESOL Focus, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 4–9, 2002.
O. E. Hago-Elmahdi, F. S. Allehyani, and M. AbdAlgane, “Exploring the ethical implications and cultural considerations in using AI technologies for EFL education in the Saudi context,” Nsukka J. Humanit., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1–30, 2025.
A. Skulmowski, “The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 35, no. 4, p. 101, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10648-023-09818-1.
S. Amonova, G. Juraeva, and M. Khidoyatov, “Harnessing the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Language Learning: is AI Threat or Opportunity?,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems, F. Azzedin, Ed., New York, NY, USA: ACM, Dec. 2023, pp. 292–297. doi: 10.1145/3644713.3644751.
E. Creely, “Exploring the Role of Generative AI in Enhancing Language Learning: Opportunities and Challenges,” Int. J. Chang. Educ., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 158–167, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022495.
Y. Zong and L. Yang, “How AI‐Enhanced Social–Emotional Learning Framework Transforms EFL Students’ Engagement and Emotional Well‐Being,” Eur. J. Educ., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1111/ejed.12925.
A. Busso and B. Sanchez, “Advancing communicative competence in the digital age: A case for AI tools in Japanese EFL education,” Technol. Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 6, no. 3, p. 1211, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.29140/tltl.v6n3.1211.
M. H. Al-khresheh, “The Future of Artificial Intelligence in English Language Teaching: Pros and Cons of ChatGPT Implementation through a Systematic Review,” Lang. Teach. Res. Q., vol. 43, pp. 54–80, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.32038/ltrq.2024.43.04.
E. Kasneci et al., “ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 103, p. 102274, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.
J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2018.
M. van Manen, Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Routledge, 2016.
B. Saunders et al., “Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization,” Qual. Quant., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1893–1907, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
E. G. Guba and Y. S. Lincoln, “Competing paradigms in qualitative research,” Handb. Qual. Res., vol. 2, no. 163–194, p. 105, 1994.
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
B. Zou, H. Reinders, M. Thomas, and D. Barr, “Editorial: Using artificial intelligence technology for language learning,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, p. 1287667, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287667.
A. Ni and A. Cheung, “Understanding secondary students’ continuance intention to adopt AI-powered intelligent tutoring system for English learning,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 3191–3216, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11305-z.
X. Bai and M. Stede, “A Survey of Current Machine Learning Approaches to Student Free-Text Evaluation for Intelligent Tutoring,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 994–1032, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s40593-022-00323-0.
D. R. E. Cotton, P. A. Cotton, and J. R. Shipway, “Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 228–239, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.
M. Liu, Y. Ren, L. M. Nyagoga, F. Stonier, Z. Wu, and L. Yu, “Future of education in the era of generative artificial intelligence: Consensus among Chinese scholars on applications of ChatGPT in schools,” Futur. Educ. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 72–101, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1002/fer3.10.
W. Holmes et al., “Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 504–526, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1.
M. Dilek, E. Baran, and E. Aleman, “AI Literacy in Teacher Education: Empowering Educators Through Critical Co-Discovery,” J. Teach. Educ., vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 294–311, May 2025, doi: 10.1177/00224871251325083.
A. Nguyen, H. N. Ngo, Y. Hong, B. Dang, and B.-P. T. Nguyen, “Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4221–4241, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w.
A. Mouta, E. M. Torrecilla-Sánchez, and A. M. Pinto-Llorente, “Comprehensive professional learning for teacher agency in addressing ethical challenges of AIED: Insights from educational design research,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 3343–3387, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12946-y.
Ministry of Information Communication and Information Technology, National artificial intelligence (A.I.) policy. Nepal: Government of Nepal, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://mocit.gov.np/content/13077/national-artifacial-intelligence--aci--policy--2082/