Main Article Content

Shandylou B. Omongos
Cathy S. Taplac

Abstract

This qualitative case study explored the complexities of reading development among elementary pupils at Payag Elementary School, a resource-constrained rural public school in Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines. Using semi-structured interviews with six reading teachers, the study examined factors influencing pupils’ reading development, teachers’ instructional responses, and potential strategies for improvement. Inductive thematic analysis revealed three major constraints affecting reading development: learner-related difficulties, socio-cultural factors, and resource limitations. Teachers responded through developmentally appropriate instruction, differentiated teaching strategies, and varied assessment practices. Findings further indicate the need for targeted professional development, improved instructional resources, and strengthened home–school collaboration. The study underscores the importance of context-sensitive, teacher-informed approaches to literacy development in rural Philippine schools.

Article Details

How to Cite
Omongos, S. B. ., & Taplac, C. S. . (2026). Reading development among elementary pupils at Payag Elementary School: Complexities and instructional implications. Eureka: Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.56773/ejer.v4i2.80
Section
Original Research

References

C. E. Snow, M. S. Burns, and P. Griffin, Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press, 1998.

National Reading Panel, “Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction,” National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2000.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics, “Literacy and learning outcomes data.” 2021.

H. L. Breadmore, E. J. Vardy, A. J. Cunningham, R. K. W. Kwok, and J. M. Carroll, “Literacy development: Evidence review,” Education Endowment Foundation, 2019.

L. C. Ehri, S. R. Nunes, and D. M. Willows, “Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 393–447, 2001.

R. K. Wagner and J. K. Torgesen, “The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in reading acquisition: Insights from the Texas Longitudinal Study,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 192–212, 1987.

A. Castles, K. Rastle, and K. Nation, “Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert,” Psychol. Sci. Public Interes., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5–51, 2018.

L. C. Moats, “Knowledge foundations for teaching reading and spelling,” Read. Writ., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 379–399, 2009.

L. S. Vygotsky and M. Cole, Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. United States of America: Harvard University Press, 1978.

D. Paris, “Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice,” Educ. Res., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 93–97, 2012.

V. J. Risko, K. Roskos, C. Vukelich, and J. Lenhart, “Linking cultural relevance and literacy learning: Implications for instruction,” J. Lit. Res., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 341–357, 2008.

K. E. Stanovich, “Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy,” Read. Res. Q., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 360–407, 1986.

M. Pressley and R. Allington, Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching, 3rd ed. Guilford Press, 2014.

C. E. Snow, “An overview of the research: Effective teaching of reading,” Queensland Department of Education, 2016.

J. K. Torgesen, “Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities,” J. Learn. Disabil., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 532–545, 2001.

C. S. Brown, “Language and literacy development in the early years: Foundational skills that support emergent readers,” ERIC, 2014.

M. Cekiso, “Teachers ’ perceptions of reading instruction in selected primary schools in the Eastern Cape,” Read. Writ. - J. Read. Assoc. South Africa, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2017.

H. Liu, X. Chen, and X. Liu, “Factors influencing secondary school students ’ reading literacy : An analysis based on XGBoost and SHAP methods,” Front. Psychol., vol. 2018, 2022.

N. Ghafournia and A. Afghari, “The Interaction between reading comprehension cognitive test-taking strategies, test performance, and cognitive language learning strategies,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 70, pp. 80–84, 2013.

M. A. K. Alenizi, “Understanding of reading among teachers and learners: A descriptive study of pre-university english language teaching/learning in Saudi Arabia,” Arab World English J., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 293–306, 2019.

Institute of Museum and Library Services, “Research on motivation, literacy and reading development: A review of best practices,” 2024.

Scholastic Education, “Ready4Reading: A literature review on foundational research,” 2023.

S. B. Merriam and E. J. Tisdell, Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.

R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods, 6th ed. SAGE Publications, 2018.

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2017.

V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006.

M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage Publications, 2002.

M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications, 2015.

Y. S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications, 1985.

J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: SAGE Publications, 2018.

M. Ryan and G. D. Hendry, “Sources of teacher efficacy in teaching reading: success, sharing, and support,” Aust. J. Lang. Lit., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023.

National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy, “Teaching Reading: Report and Recommendations,” Canberra, 2005.

M. Tschannen-Moran and A. Woolfolk Hoy, “Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 783–805, 2001.