Technology devices: Can it enhance pre-service teachers' teaching?
Main Article Content
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in schools being closed around the world. Globally, most children are outside the classroom. As a result, education has changed dramatically, with the advent of typical e-learning, where teaching is done remotely and on digital platforms. These conditions are very demanding on information skills, media, and technology as a solution to these problems. All school activities had been shifted to an online delivery mode, which causes the implementation of teaching practices to be carried out online. This transfer forces pre-service teachers to have different teaching practice experiences. Technological devices are the facilities they use to support online learning. This study aims to describe the implementation and perceptions of pre-service teachers on their teaching practice experiences during the pandemic. Class observations are made on the implementation of English pre-service teachers’ teaching by implementing technological devices in three public junior high schools in Semarang. To evaluate how the teaching and learning process in applying technological devices, the Technological Integrated Matrix (TIM) by Florida Center for Instructional Technology is used as a framework for analyzing the data. TIM provides a framework for describing and targeting the use of technology to enhance learning. Questionnaires and interviews are also administered to obtain information about the pre-service teachers' perceptions of online learning during the pandemic era. Therefore, despite the limitations of its implementation, teaching practice programs tend to form a positive mindset and teaching attitude for pre-service teachers.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
P. Newbill and L. Baum, “Design Creativity!.,” Learn. Lead. with Technol., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 16–19, 2013.
K. Sheingold and M. Hadley, Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice. New York, NY: Center for Technology in Education, 1990.
E. Moon, E. Lee, Y. Lee, H. Kwon, W. Shin, and I. Park, “Influence of the Teaching Practicum on Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions of Good Teaching,” in The Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 2016, vol. 26, pp. 93–101.
M. C. Abas, “Pre-Service Teachers’ Experiences during Off-Campus Observation: Basis for Improving the Roles of Teacher Education Institutions and Cooperating Schools,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 187–202, May 2016.
B. Genc and K. Buyukkarci, “An assessment of pre-service language teachers’ practicum observation forms: Descriptive observation vs. critical observation,” Educ. Res. eJournal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 83–91, 2013.
B. Afalla and F. Fabelico, “Pre-service teachers’ pedagogical competence and teaching efficiency,” J. Crit. Rev., vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 223–228, Jun. 2020.
N. Yuliani, S. Muljanto, and Y. N. Fajriah, “Professional development of senior high school efl teachers: voices from teachers,” EEAL J. (English Educ. Appl. Linguist. Journal), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 54–68, 2019.
F. Amankwah, P. Oti-Agyen, and F. K. Sam, “Perception of Pre-Service Teachers’ towards the Teaching Practice Programme in College of Technology Education, University of Education, Winneba.,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 13–20, 2017.
D. G. Varela and M. F. Desiderio, “Perceptions of COVID-19 pandemic impact on the student teaching experience,” Res. High. Educ. J., vol. 39, pp. 1–12, 2021.
N. Ismatun and Q. Sadida, “The effects online learning on preteachers’ social after service facilitation Covid-19 pandemic,” Proceeding Int. Webinar Educ., pp. 129–134, 2020.
S. R. Graham, A. Tolar, and H. Hokayem, “Teaching Preservice Teachers about COVID-19 through Distance Learning,” Electron. J. Res. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 29–37, 2020.
A. Lewis, “The issue of perception: some educational implications,” Educare, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 272–288, 2001.
J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. USA: SAGE Publications, 2017.