Keterlibatan berpikir siswa: Status “ada” dalam pembelajaran
Main Article Content
Abstract
Kurikulum pendidikan telah beberapa kali mengalami perubahan karena tuntutan perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan kebutuhan masa depan. Di setiap perubahan, siswa tetap dituntut untuk terus-menerus menggenerasi pengetahuan. Dalam pembelajaran, perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi telah meningkatkan peran siswa dan sekaligus mengurangi peran guru. Tulisan ini merangkum bagaimana proses belajar yang sampai dengan menggenerasi pengetahuan baru dan tetap menyesuaikan pada konteks perubahan. Belajar lebih baik jika melibatkan aspek kognitif dan metakognitif, serta mengoptimalisasi fungsi pikiran sadar dan bawah sadar. Berpikir, memfungsikan scaffolding, dan menerapkan pembelajaran yang mempersempit zone of proximal development (ZPD) adalah proses dalam rangka mendekatkan diri sampai sedekat mungkin dengan pengetahuan baru. Upaya itu disebut dengan keterlibatan. Berpikir termasuk bentuk keterlibatan dan status keberadaan, seperti: clarification, assessment, inference, dan strategies, untuk tujuan membentuk organisasi tubuh informasi melalui pemaknaan data dan kemudian memprosesnya ke dalam belief system sehingga menjadi pengetahuan.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
D. Wirianto, “Perspektif historis transformasi kurikulum di Indonesia,” Islam. Stud. J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 133–147, 2014.
I. Iramdan and L. Manurung, “Sejarah Kurikulum di Indonesia,” J. Ilm. Wahana Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 88–95, 2019.
A. Alhamuddin, “Sejarah Kurikulum di Indonesia (Studi Analisis Kebijakan Pengembangan Kurikulum),” Nur El-Islam, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 48–58, 2014.
R. Riowati and N. H. Yoenanto, “Peran Guru Penggerak pada Merdeka Belajar untuk Memperbaiki Mutu Pendidikan di Indonesia,” JOEAI J. Educ. Instr., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2022.
R. Fernandes, “Relevansi Kurikulum 2013 dengan kebutuhan Peserta didik di Era Revolusi 4.0,” J. Socius J. Sociol. Res. Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 70–80, 2019.
A. Pritchard, Ways of learning: Learning theories for the classroom. Routledge, 2017.
R. I. Arends, Learning to teach. McGraw-Hill Companies, 2015.
A. N. Darwazeh, “A new revision of the [revised] bloom’s taxonomy,” Distance Learn., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 13–28, 2017.
D. Tall, How humans learn to think mathematically: Exploring the three worlds of mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
J. Sweller, “Cognitive load theory and educational technology,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Feb. 2020.
J. Hey, “The data, information, knowledge, wisdom chain: the metaphorical link,” Intergov. Oceanogr. Comm., vol. 26, pp. 1–18, 2004.
F. Alghadari, A. Yundayani, and M. Genç, “Learning Habits Shaping Mathematical Literacy: Lens Through the Chronology of Time and Cognitive Processes,” IndoMath Indones. Math. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 42–54, 2022.
M. Arifin, “Learning Management System (LMS) Berbasis Android Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Penunjang Creative Thinking Skill Mathematics Siswa,” ASNA J. Kependidikan Islam dan Keagamaan, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 12–27, 2020.
L. A. Steen, R. Turner, and H. Burkhardt, “Developing Mathematical Literacy,” in Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education, Boston, MA: Springer US, 2007, pp. 285–294.
S. Gupta, H. K. Verma, and A. L. Sangal, “Security attacks & prerequisite for wireless sensor networks,” Intl J. Eng. Adv. Technol., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 558–566, 2013.
F. Alghadari and N. A. Noor, “Students depend on the Pythagorean theorem: Analysis by the three parallel design of abstraction thinking problem,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, vol. 1657, no. 1, p. 12005.
F. Alghadari and T. Herman, “The Obstacles of Geometric Problem-Solving on Solid with Vector and Triangle Approach,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1132, no. 1, p. 012046, 2018.
N. A. Noor and F. Alghadari, “Conceptual technique for comparison figures by geometric thinking in analysis level,” J. Math. Educ. Teach. Pract., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2021.
J. N. Martin, “Using the PICARD Theory as a Tool to Improve Systems Thinking Ability,” in Disciplinary Convergence in Systems Engineering Research, Springer, 2018, pp. 697–711.
G. P. Baxter, K. M. Bass, and R. Glaser, “Notebook writing in three fifth-grade science classrooms,” Elem. Sch. J., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 123–140, 2001.
S. Lerman, Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 2nd ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020.
N. A. Shukor, Z. Tasir, H. der Meijden, and J. Harun, “A predictive model to evaluate students’ cognitive engagement in online learning,” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., vol. 116, pp. 4844–4853, 2014.
J. Turri, “Is knowledge justified true belief?,” Synthese, vol. 184, no. 3, pp. 247–259, 2012.
S. Appana, “A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor and the tenured faculty,” Int. J. E-learning, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2008.
J. Dutant, “The legend of the justified true belief analysis,” Philos. Perspect., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 95–145, 2015.
W. Huitt, “The information processing approach to cognition,” Educ. Psychol. Interact., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 53–59, 2003.
S. Sunardi and S. Sujito, “Eksplanasi Pengobatan Alternatif Supranatural Berdasarkan Tinjauan Teori Gelombang Otak Dan Hipnosis,” J. Filsafat Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2019.
S. Rijal, “Hipnolinguistik: Bahasa Alam Bawah Sadar,” J. Pendidik. Progresif, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 190–198, 2015.
Y. U. Afif, “Strategi Pembelajaran Materi PAI dengan Metode Hypnoteaching untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” Ibriez J. Kependidikan Dasar Islam Berbas. Sains, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 92–102, 2021.
A. Prastowo, “Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Dasar/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Berbasis Pemberdayaan Pikiran Bawah Sadar,” Al-Aulad J. Islam. Prim. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 54–64, 2018.
S. Munafiah, “Strategi Hypnosis Learning,” SKULA J. Pendidik. Profesi Guru Madrasah, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 221–228, 2021.
N. Nikmarijal and B. Ahmad, “Mereduksi Negatif Belief dengan Pendekatan Hipnoterapi,” Tarbawy J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 113–117, 2019.
K. Gito, A. Juanda, and Y. Maryuningsih, “Penggunaan Metode Hypnoteaching dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis IMTAQ untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa pada Konsep Sistem Reproduksi di SMA Negeri 5 Cirebon,” Sci. Educ. J. Pendidik. Sains, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 37–52, 2013.
D. Sunardi and A. Yuniarti, “Mind Miracle: Eksplorasi Potensi Otak Melalui Hipnosis.” Suma Cipta Sarana, 2017.
D. Aharoni, “Cogito, Ergo sum! cognitive processes of students dealing with data structures,” in Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 2000, pp. 26–30.
J. J. Holder, “An epistemological foundation for thinking: A Deweyan approach,” Stud. Philos. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3–4, pp. 175–192, 1994.
M. Henningsen and M. K. Stein, “Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 524–549, 1997.
S. N. A. Rabu, B. Aris, and Z. Tasir, “Teaching critical thinking through online instructor scaffolding: A conceptual framework,” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., vol. 97, pp. 314–319, 2013.
S. N. A. Rabu, B. Aris, and Z. Tasir, “Instructor Scaffolding and Students’ Critical Thinking through Asynchronous Online Discussion Forum,” in 2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering, 2013, pp. 216–219.
S. N. A. Rabu, B. Aris, and Z. Tasir, “Level of students’critical thinking engagement in an online instructional multimedia development scenario-based discussion forum,” in The 13th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, 2017, vol. 2, pp. 18–25.
B. Sanchez, “Pre-service Teachers Characterization and Engagement Levels of Critical Reading,” J. Educ. Hum. Dev., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–6, 2016.