Instructional teaching theory: Basis for effective teaching device in learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study examines the contribution of instructional teaching theory in educational system as a basis for effective teaching devices in learning as to print materials, electronic media, technology devices, visualization and graphics, games, and interactive resources. The study employs descriptive quantitative research designs because it measures and quantifies the variables of the study on the contribution of instructional teaching theory in educational system. Likewise, convenience purposive sampling is utilized in the study. It is a non-probability sampling method in gathering the sample size of the study. The study comprised one hundred seventy five (175) respondents only. Results show to offer and plan step by step lesson, time saving, assessment materials, testing, and worksheets, to create and allow multiple friendly learning for students to listen in audiobooks, CDs, using headset to avoid disturbance from other classmates, show to help and develop deeper learning and understanding process of students, and show learning factor on the concept of instructional teaching that can turn complex things into play. Findings show that there is a significant correlation on the contribution of instructional teaching theory in educational system as a basis for effective devices in learning as observed by the respondents.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
L. L. D. Mallillin, J. C. Cabaluna, R. D. Laurel, P. A. C. Arroyo, T. M. Señoron Jr, and J. B. Mallillin, “Structural domain of learning and teaching strategies in the academic performance of students,” Eur. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 187–208, Aug. 2021.
L. L. D. Mallillin and J. B. Mallillin, “Competency skills and performance level of faculties in the higher education institution (HEI),” Eur. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1–18, 2019.
L. L. D. Mallillin, “Different Domains in Learning and the Academic Performance of the Students,” J. Educ. Syst., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2020.
T. A. Glover, L. A. Reddy, and K. Crouse, “Instructional coaching actions that predict teacher classroom practices and student achievement,” J. Sch. Psychol., vol. 96, pp. 1–11, Feb. 2023.
L. L. D. Mallillin, L. C. Mendoza, J. B. Mallillin, R. C. Felix, and I. C. Lipayon, “Implementation and readiness of online learning pedagogy: a transition to COVID 19 pandemic,” Eur. J. Open Educ. E-learning Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 71–90, Sep. 2020.
L. L. D. Mallillin, “Teaching and learning intervention in the educational setting: adapting the teacher theory model,” Int. J. Educ. Innov. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 99–121, Jul. 2022.
S. Prediger, J. Dröse, R. Stahnke, and C. Ademmer, “Teacher expertise for fostering at-risk students’ understanding of basic concepts: conceptual model and evidence for growth,” J. Math. Teach. Educ., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 481–508, Aug. 2023.
L. L. D. Mallillin, E. A. Carag, J. B. Mallillin, and R. D. Laurel, “Integration of knowledge through online classes in the learning enhancement of students,” Eur. J. Open Educ. E-learning Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19–33, Jun. 2020.
L. L. D. Mallillin, “Teacher theory and adaptable model: an application to teaching profession,” Eur. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 299–311, Nov. 2021.
M. Badali, J. Hatami, M. Farrokhnia, and O. Noroozi, “The effects of using Merrill’s first principles of instruction on learning and satisfaction in MOOC,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 216–225, Mar. 2022.
H. Ruiz-Martín and R. W. Bybee, “The cognitive principles of learning underlying the 5E Model of Instruction,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 21, Dec. 2022.
D. I. Hanauer et al., “Instructional Models for Course-Based Research Experience (CRE) Teaching,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, p. ar8, Mar. 2022.
A. Singh and P. A. Alexander, “Audiobooks, Print, and Comprehension: What We Know and What We Need to Know,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 677–715, Jun. 2022.
J. Q. Juan Qian, “Research on Artificial Intelligence Technology of Virtual Reality Teaching Method in Digital Media Art Creation,” 網際網路技術學刊, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 127–134, Jan. 2022.
R. Ziatdinov and J. R. Valles, “Synthesis of Modeling, Visualization, and Programming in GeoGebra as an Effective Approach for Teaching and Learning STEM Topics,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 398, Jan. 2022.
N. Bado, “Game-based learning pedagogy: a review of the literature,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 936–948, May 2022.
P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, and D. Larsen-Freeman, “Toward a transdisciplinary integration of research purposes and methods for complex dynamic systems theory: beyond the quantitative–qualitative divide,” Int. Rev. Appl. Linguist. Lang. Teach., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 7–22, Mar. 2022.
S. E. Scholtz, “Sacrifice is a step beyond convenience: A review of convenience sampling in psychological research in Africa,” SA J. Ind. Psychol., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–12, May 2021.
M. M. C. Shohel, S. Shams, M. Ashrafuzzaman, A. S. Alam, M. A. Al Mamun, and M. M. Kabir, “Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning,” in Handbook of research on Asian perspectives of the educational impact of COVID-19, M. R. Islam, S. K. Behera, and L. Naibaho, Eds. IGI Global, 2022, pp. 175–200.
L. M. Díaz-Vázquez, B. M. Ortiz-Andrade, M. L. Kovarik, and M. L. Morris, “Active Learning Exercises Involving Building and Design,” in Active Learning in the Analytical Chemistry Curriculum, ACS Publications, 2022, pp. 181–204.
E. Spica, “The Influence of Technological Savviness and Home Internet Access on Student Preferences for Print or Digital Course Materials.,” Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 81–96, 2022.
J.-C. Mateus, P. Andrada, C. González-Cabrera, C. Ugalde, and S. Novomisky, “Teachers’ perspectives for a critical agenda in media education post COVID-19. A comparative study in Latin America,” Comunicar, vol. 30, no. 70, pp. 9–19, Jan. 2022.
E. Sulasmi, “Primary School Teachers’ Digital Literacy: An Analysis On Teachers’ Skills In Using Technological Devices,” J. Innov. Educ. Cult. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 140–145, Feb. 2022.
R. Hobbs and J. Coiro, “Design Features of a Professional Development Program in Digital Literacy,” J. Adolesc. Adult Lit., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 401–409, Jan. 2019.
V. N. I. Sari and S. Suwandi, “Multimedia-Based Interactive Learning Media In The Text Material Of The Observation Report,” in International Conference of Humanities and Social Science (ICHSS), 2021, pp. 224–230.
S. Lumley, R. Sieber, and R. Roth, “A framework and comparative analysis of web-based climate change visualization tools,” Comput. Graph., vol. 103, pp. 19–30, Apr. 2022.
J. M. Abbazio and Z. S. Yang, “Are Infographics Worth It?: An Assessment of Information Retention in Relation to Information Embedded in Infographics,” Music Ref. Serv. Q., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 99–130, Oct. 2022.
D. Park, M. Suhail, M. Zheng, C. Dunne, E. Ragan, and N. Elmqvist, “StoryFacets: A design study on storytelling with visualizations for collaborative data analysis,” Inf. Vis., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 3–16, Aug. 2021.
M. He and Y. Li, “Application of Big Data Technology in News Media Scene Visualization Based on Internet of Things (IoTs),” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2022, pp. 1–10, Jun. 2022.
E. Jääskä and K. Aaltonen, “Teachers’ experiences of using game-based learning methods in project management higher education,” Proj. Leadersh. Soc., vol. 3, p. 100041, Dec. 2022.
C.-Y. Chang, M.-H. Chung, and J. C. Yang, “Facilitating nursing students’ skill training in distance education via online game-based learning with the watch-summarize-question approach during the COVID-19 pandemic: A quasi-experimental study,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 109, p. 105256, Feb. 2022.
D. Wang, H. Liu, and K.-T. Hau, “Automated and interactive game-based assessment of critical thinking,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 4553–4575, May 2022.
F. M. Zain, S. N. Sailin, and N. A. Mahmor, “Promoting Higher Order Thinking Skills among Pre-Service Teachers through Group-Based Flipped Learning,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 519–542, Jul. 2022.