Main Article Content

Fedelis Lekeaka Alemnge
Efuetngap Reginta

Abstract

The rapid growth and sophistication of handheld phones, supported by accessible software, have made them indispensable for students, enabling instant access, storage, retrieval, and refinement of information anytime and anywhere. This study seeks to obtain insights into how the use of technology in teaching and learning influences students’ learning. Participants in the study revealed that the relationship between the Use of Search Engines (USE) in teaching and academic achievement of students in the College of Technology of the University of Buea was statistically significant. The correlation coefficient for the same relationship indicated a weak positive relationship, while qualitative data reveled that teachers held divergent, but positive views on how search engines were used in teaching. The qualitative findings on teachers’ views of how search engines influence students’ academic achievement also presented a variety of ways through which students consolidate their learning. Regarding the use of cellphones, students on the average reported favourable attitudes, implying that the relationship was statistically significant, while the correlation showed a moderate negative relationship. Teachers provided a variety of positive ways in which cellphones are used in teaching, and in relation to its influence on learning indicated that it increased their pace while fostering program coverage. They, however, indicted that it also caused distractions. Based on Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory, educators should adapt technology use to adopter categories to enhance learning and reduce distractions.

Article Details

How to Cite
Alemnge, F. L. ., & Reginta, E. . (2025). The influence of internet search engines and cellphones on the achievement of college of technology students in Cameroon . Eureka: Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.56773/ejer.v4i1.76
Section
Original Research

References

F. Naumann, Search Engines. Germany: Hasso Plattner Institut, Universität Potsdam, 2009.

B. Lutkevich, “Search Engine,” TechTarget, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/search-engine.

W. B. Croft, D. Metzler, and T. Strohman, Search Engines: Information Retrieval in Practice. Pearson Education, Inc, 2015.

I. Bokova, A New humanism for the 21st Century. Paris: UNESCO, 2010.

O. S. Ozonuwe, H. O. Nwaogu, G. Ifijeh, and M. Fagbohun, “An assessment of the use of search engines in an academic environrment,” Int. J. Libr. Sci., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 23–33, 2018.

M. S. Shahibi and K. N. K. K. Rusli, “The Influence of Internet Usage on Student’s Academic Performance,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 873–887, Oct. 2017.

E. S. Soegoto and S. Tjokroadiponto, “Effect of Internet on Student’s Academic Performance and Social Life,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 407, p. 012176, Sep. 2018.

N. Nawaz, “Impact of Internet on Academic Performance of University Students in Pakistan,” Eur. Sci. J. ESJ, vol. 17, no. 38, pp. 1–18, Nov. 2021.

F. S. Ng, N. S. I. C. Hassan, N. H. M. Nor, and N. A. A. Malek, “The Relationship Between Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: A Case of Students in a Malaysian Tertiary Institution,” Malaysian Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 58–70, 2017.

K. O. Frimpong, S. Asare, and D. Otoo-Arthur, “The Effects of Mobile Phone Usage on the Academic Performance of Ghanaian Students, a Case of Presbyterian University College Asante - Akyem Campus,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Stud., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 33–43, 2016.

H. Rabiu, A. I. Muhammed, Y. Umaru, and H. T. Ahmed, “Impact Of Mobile Phone Usage On Academic Performance Among Secondary School Students In Taraba State, Nigeria,” Eur. Sci. Journal, ESJ, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 466, Jan. 2016.

C. Halton, “Diffusion of Innovations Theory: Definition and Examples,” Investopedia, Dec-2023.

E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. Free Press, 2003.

M. Johnson and C. Muscato, “Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory: Model & Adopters,” Study.com, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://study.com/academy/lesson/diffusion-of-innovation-theory-history-examples.html.

M. K. Minishi-Majanja and J. Kiplang’at, “The diffusion of innovations theory as a theoretical framework in Library and Information Science research,” South African J. Libr. Inf. Sci., vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 211–224, Mar. 2013.

P. Seymour, “Constructionism,” in Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development, E. A. Forman, N. Minick, and C. A. Stone, Eds. Oxford University Press, 1980.

I. Alzahrani and J. Woollard, “The Role of the Constructivist Learning Theory and Collaborative Learning Environment on Wiki Classroom, and the Relationship between Them,” in 3rd International Conference For e-learning & Distance Education, 2013.

P. A. Ertmer and T. J. Newby, “Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective,” Perform. Improv. Q., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 43–71, 2013.

J. S. Brown, A. Collins, and P. Duguid, “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning,” Jun. 1988.

L. D. Cook and V. J. Kamalodeen, “Mixed Methods Case Study Research,” 2019.

V. L. P. Clark and J. W. Creswell, The mixed methods reader. SAGE Publications, 2008.

R. J. Spiro and J.-C. Jehng, “Cognitive Flexibility and Hypertext: Theory and Technology for the Nonlinear and Multidimensional Traversal of Complex Subject Matter,” in Cognition, Education, and Multimedia, D. Nix and R. Spiro, Eds. New York: Routledge, 2012, pp. 177–220.

M. Hossain, “Impact of Mobile Phone Usage on Academic Performance,” World Sci. News, vol. 118, pp. 164–180, 2019.